Estudios & Surveys

HayMax ha sido objeto de dos estudios independientes en la Unidad de Investigación de Aerobiología de polen y Nacional (NPARU- The UK’s leading Authority on Airborne Allergens), two surveys by Allergy UK (the leading UK allergy charity) and one trial by HayMax at the very beginning…

En esta página encontrará un resumen de cada encuesta y el estudio, and a link for downloading the complete reports. They are quite long, but make a fascinating read!

Survey on HayMax, 2015.

En 2015, Allergy UK conducted a survey called ‘The Impact of Hay Fever, a Survey by Allergy UK, Inspección de la Eficacia de HayMax alérgenos Barrera Bálsamo '. The first part of the survey was about the respondents hay fever symptoms, and the second half asked respondents to try HayMax and answer a series of questions post trial.

Key survey finding: When asked if overall HayMax worked, 80% said ‘Yes’ (134/166 respondents).

There are lots more interesting statistics in the report, which can be downloaded using the link below.

Lea la 2015 Allergy UK survey report here!

Survey on HayMax, 2014.

En 2014, Allergy UK conducted a survey called ‘Are you suffering from seasonal allergic rhinitis (fiebre de heno)? – Surveying the effectiveness of HayMax allergen barrier balm.

As with the 2015 survey, the first half of the survey was to help us better understand the respondents symptoms, and the second half was completed after trialling HayMax, either on themselves or on their children. The results were fantastic.

Key survey finding: 78% said that HayMax helped some or all of their symptoms (56/73).

Lea la 2014 Allergy UK survey report here!

HayMax Encuesta de la Universidad de Worcester (NPARU), 2012.

This further study looked at whether HayMax can trap indoor and outdoor airborne particles such as pollens in a more controlled environment. The study required healthy volunteers who did not suffer from allergic rhinitis to visit NPARU 4 times over a 3 week period.

Key trial finding: HayMax traps over a third of pollen before it enters the body, in addition to dust mite allergens and pet dander.

NPARU Trial Reportar HayMax 2012

HayMax Encuesta de la Universidad de Worcester (NPARU), 2009.

Profesor Jean Emberlin, director de la Unidad de InvestigaciĂłn de AerobiologĂ­a Polen Nacional y (NPARU) at the University of Worcester completed independent research on HayMax™ during the peak grass pollen season in 2009.

The study aimed to assess the number of pollen grains that are trapped by HayMax balm when applied in a standard manner to the rim and the inside of nostrils compared with the amount deposited on uncoated nostrils.

Key trial finding: The application of HayMax™ to the lower part and rim of the nostrils does trap significantly more pollen than an uncoated nostril.

NPARU Study of HayMax 2009

(They are called ‘confidential’ informes, but don’t worry, estamos eligiendo a compartir con ustedes!).

Other interesting trials!

Ensayos Estatal de MoscĂş- “Efficacy of pollen blocker cream in the treatment of allergic rhinitis

This was a double-blind placebo controlled trial conducted to show the efficacy of pollen barriers. This was not a trial conducted on HayMax, but it is an interesting study of a similar type of product.

Lea la Ensayos Estatal de MoscĂş Report

Nuestros primeros ensayos! We like testing on humans…

We ran a trial of HayMax™ in July, Agosto y septiembre de 2004.

Aproximadamente 700 personas (Max Wiseberg’s contact list at his previous business) enviĂ© un correo electrĂłnico y se ofreciĂł producto gratis a cambio de respuestas genuinas y honestas en un cuestionario. Además de 2, los encuestados eran personas que no sabĂ­an Max, who had had the email passed on to them by Max’s contact.

Este fue un ensayo simple, sin grupo control y no el placebo y no fue publicado y no podía ser considerado como cualquier tipo de ensayo clínico. Fue hecho con el fin de establecer que el producto trabajó para otras personas además de su inventor y que podría ser comercializable.

Los conteos de polen eran regularmente alta durante el juicio.

Se les pidiĂł que calificaran en una escala de 1 a 5:

  • 5; TrabajĂł con brillantez. No hay estornudos, ninguna irritaciĂłn de los ojos
  • 4: TrabajĂł bien. Estornudo ocasional y / o irritaciĂłn de los ojos
  • 3: Trabajado: ReducciĂłn de los efectos. Pero aĂşn asĂ­ obtener los ataques de estornudos, etc.
  • 2: Apenas trabajado: ÂżSigues teniendo la mayor parte de los efectos.
  • 1: Didn’t work: No ayuda en absoluto. AsĂ­ como horrible como siempre.

Todos los entrevistados dijeron que funcionó y dio una señal de 3 o mejor.

All respondents who had the opportunity to try HayMax™ during their allergic season reported that HayMax™ worked.

There were no reported side effects.

HayMax™ would like to conduct proper clinical trials in the future, cuando los fondos permitirán.